In recent years, the field of astronomy has found itself grappling with a significant quandary. While we have long been aware of the expansion of the Universe and have a rough idea of its rate, the two primary methods for gauging this expansion seem to disagree. However, astrophysicists from the Niels Bohr Institute have proposed a novel approach that could potentially resolve this ongoing cosmic conundrum.
The Expansion of the Universe:
Our understanding of the Universe’s expansion dates back to pioneers like Edwin Hubble, who, approximately a century ago, meticulously measured the velocities of numerous galaxies. These galaxies, driven by the expanding cosmos, are continually moving away from each other, resulting in a cosmic expansion.
The rate at which galaxies move apart, directly tied to their separation distance, is encapsulated by a fundamental cosmological parameter known as the “Hubble constant.” This constant plays a pivotal role in various equations and models concerning the Universe and its constituents.
The Hubble Constant Dilemma:
To gain deeper insights into the Universe, it’s imperative to determine the Hubble constant with utmost precision. Several methods exist to measure it, all mutually independent, but until recently, they yielded similar results.
The most straightforward method, conceptually akin to Edwin Hubble’s original approach, involves identifying galaxies, measuring their distances, and tracking their speeds. In practice, this is accomplished by studying galaxies with supernovae, which are exploding stars. This method is complemented by another, which scrutinizes irregularities in the cosmic background radiation—an ancient form of light originating shortly after the Big Bang.
However, these two methods, the supernova approach and the background radiation approach, consistently provided slightly different outcomes. Initially, these discrepancies were attributed to measurement uncertainties. Yet, as measurement techniques improved, uncertainties dwindled, revealing a striking reality: both methods could not be simultaneously correct.
The Essence of the “Hubble Trouble”:
The Universe’s expansion rate is quantified in terms of “speed per distance,” approximately 20 km/s per million light-years. Thus, a galaxy situated 100 million light-years away recedes at 2,000 km/s, while one 200 million light-years distant races away at 4,000 km/s.
However, using supernovae to gauge distances and velocities yields a Hubble constant of 22.7 ± 0.4 km/s, whereas analyzing the background radiation suggests 20.7 ± 0.2 km/s.
Although the discrepancy might seem minute, it carries significant implications. For instance, this number plays a pivotal role in estimating the age of the Universe, yielding values of 12.8 and 13.8 billion years for the two methods, respectively.
Kilonovae: A Novel Approach:
One of the primary challenges in this pursuit is accurately determining galaxy distances. In a groundbreaking study, Albert Sneppen, a PhD student in astrophysics at the Cosmic Dawn Center at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, has proposed an innovative method to measure distances, potentially paving the way for resolving this persistent disagreement.
Sneppen explains, “When two ultra-compact neutron stars—themselves remnants of supernovae—orbit each other and eventually merge, they produce a new explosion known as a ‘kilonova.’ We’ve recently uncovered that this explosion exhibits remarkable symmetry, and this symmetry is not only aesthetically pleasing but also extraordinarily useful.”
In a newly published study, Sneppen demonstrates that despite their complexity, kilonovae can be characterized by a single temperature. Moreover, this symmetry and simplicity allow astronomers to precisely determine the amount of light emitted by kilonovae. By comparing this luminosity with the light reaching Earth, researchers can calculate the kilonova’s distance, offering a novel, independent approach for gauging galaxy distances.
Darach Watson, an associate professor at the Cosmic Dawn Center and co-author of the study, adds, “Supernovae, traditionally used for measuring galaxy distances, do not consistently emit the same amount of light. Additionally, they necessitate calibration using another type of stars called Cepheids, which introduces further uncertainties. With kilonovae, we can circumvent these complexities that contribute to measurement uncertainties.”
Preliminary Findings and Future Endeavors:
To demonstrate the potential of this method, astrophysicists applied it to a kilonova discovered in 2017. The result yielded a Hubble constant value closer to that obtained through the background radiation method. However, the researchers exercise caution in drawing firm conclusions.
Albert Sneppen notes, “We currently have only one case study to work with, and we require many more examples before establishing a robust result. Nonetheless, our method sidesteps certain known sources of uncertainty and offers a clean system for investigation, devoid of the need for calibration or correction factors.”
In conclusion, this novel approach involving kilonovae presents a promising avenue for addressing the Hubble constant disagreement, potentially shedding light on some of the Universe’s deepest mysteries. [Reference: “Measuring the Hubble constant with kilonovae using the expanding photosphere method” by Albert Sneppen, Darach Watson, Dovi Poznanski, Oliver Just, Andreas Bauswein, and Radosław Wojtak, published on October 2, 2023, in Astronomy & Astrophysics.]
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Genz Flash journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.